"Our underlying business performance in the first half of the year was strong as we grew our revenue on improved pricing and solid vehicle launches," CEO Mary Barra said in GM's statement.
In North America, pretax profit excluding special items was $1.39 billion, down from $1.98 billion from a year earlier. The bottom line was hurt by about $1 billion in recall expenses.
Strong pricing in North America aided GM's pretax bottom line by about $800 million compared to the second quarter 2013, thanks mostly to heady pricing on its redesigned pickups and SUVs. Stevens said that average transaction prices on pickups in the quarter up roughly $5,000 vs. a year earlier. SUV transaction prices were up $6,000-$7,000, he said.
"We continue to have very strong pricing on recently launched products," Stevens told reporters at GM headquarters today. He said incentive spending industrywide has "generally been in line with the past three or four years."
Stevens said that GM sold about 6,600 vehicles in the quarter to customers who came in to have their faulty ignition switches replaced. The defect is linked to 13 deaths and is the subject of several federal investigations, including a Department of Justice probe.
GM's international division posted a $315 million pretax profit, up 36 percent from a year earlier. The company recorded about $500 million in pretax income from China, but lost money on the rest of its international operation, which includes India, Australia, southeast Asia and other markets.
In South America, GM lost $81 million, vs. a $54 million pretax profit a year earlier.
GM Financial posted $258 million in pretax income for the quarter, up 2 percent.
The $874 million charge for future recall expenses stems from a change GM is making in how it estimates future recall costs. The money was set aside to cover potential liabilities over the next decade from the roughly 30 million GM cars on the road in North America.
Going forward, GM will set aside anticipated recall costs when each vehicle is sold. Stevens said "improved analytics" allow GM to more precisely peg its exposure to future recall costs. He said the practice is similar to how it books future expenses for warranty claims.
Stevens expects recall costs in the second half of the year to be "closer to" GM's historical average